<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scrum Wanted! &#187; fault-tolerance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scrumwanted.com/tag/fault-tolerance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scrumwanted.com</link>
	<description>A weblog for Scrum enthusiasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:03:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;Oh, we just call it Scrum!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.scrumwanted.com/2009/12/oh-we-just-call-it-scrum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scrumwanted.com/2009/12/oh-we-just-call-it-scrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrum Ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault-tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impediments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrumwanted.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting discussion going on in the Scrum discussion group on XING: The question is why organizations call projects Scrum projects although they seem to have no intention to use Scrum at all. Some people in the discussion suspect this a trend to make projects sound modern and appealing. I absolutely agree and think this is clear evidence of growing Scrum ignorance.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting discussion going on <a href="https://www.xing.com/net/scrummaster/fragen-und-antworten-zu-scrum-q-a-115531/scrum-als-tunche-26741111/26741111/#26741111">in the Scrum discussion group on XING</a>: The question is why organizations call projects Scrum projects although they seem to have no intention to use Scrum at all. Some people in the discussion suspect this a trend to make projects sound modern and appealing. I absolutely agree and think this is clear evidence of growing <a href="http://www.scrumwanted.com/2009/12/scrum-ignorance/">Scrum ignorance</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scrumwanted.com/2009/12/oh-we-just-call-it-scrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrum Ignorance: &#8220;Scrum does not work because&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.scrumwanted.com/2009/12/scrum-ignorance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scrumwanted.com/2009/12/scrum-ignorance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scrum Ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily scrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault-tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro-management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrospection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterfall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrumwanted.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;Scrum does not work and I won&#8217;t even give it a try!&#8221;
 &#8212; anonymous ignorant
This collection of all the ignorant statements I have come across since I have been using Scrum should help you reply to similar statements in case you will ever be confronted with them:

&#8220;Scrum does not work because it is not fault-tolerant&#8221;
&#8220;Sprint reviews are a waste of time! Let&#8217;s skip them!&#8221;
&#8220;Daily Scrums are micro-management! Let&#8217;s not do this!&#8221;
&#8220;Scrum is waterfall because you are working on stories consecutively!&#8221;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">
<div id="attachment_75" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 306px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-75" title="You'Re wrong. But that's ok, you can blame your ignorance." src="http://www.scrumwanted.com/wp-content/uploads/3252135212_19f8e362b2-296x300.jpg" alt="Photo by Flickr user &quot;johnscotthaydon&quot; http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnhaydon/3252135212/" width="296" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo by Flickr user &quot;johnscotthaydon&quot; http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnhaydon/3252135212/</p></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><strong>&#8220;Scrum does not work and I won&#8217;t even give it a try!&#8221;</strong><br />
<span style="font-style: normal;"> &#8212; anonymous ignorant</span></em></p>
<p>This collection of all the ignorant statements I have come across since I have been using Scrum should help you reply to similar statements in case you will ever be confronted with them:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/2009/11/scrum-is-not-fault-tolerant/">&#8220;Scrum does not work because it is not fault-tolerant&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/11/sprint-reviews-are-waste-of-time/">&#8220;Sprint reviews are a waste of time! Let&#8217;s skip them!&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/12/daily-scrums-are-micro-management">&#8220;Daily Scrums are micro-management! Let&#8217;s not do this!&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/11/scrum-is-waterfall/">&#8220;Scrum is waterfall because you are working on stories consecutively!&#8221;</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scrumwanted.com/2009/12/scrum-ignorance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
